I hate to even mention his obnoxious dumb ass because I'd rather he just disappear off my radar, however since he's the current GOP frontrunner I can't not comment on Trump's offensive ethos, to wit: if you're smart you must be rich and if you're rich you must be smart.
(I refuse to respond to his comments about Mexican-American immigrants - I can't stoop that low without wrenching my back.)
Here's what I know:
Many of the most enlightened beings I've met been humble ascetics, by choice.
The decisions I've made in my own life which have enriched my existence immeasurably while impoverishing me financially are those I regret the least.
Not everyone born into privilege is a rocket scientist (Bush II, anyone?); many "self-made-men" simply luck into it (see: the inventor of the paperclip).
The donald isn't just wrong, though, or I wouldn't be writing this - far more caustically, he is full-on declaring that struggling lower and middle class men and women are in their situations because they lack IQ, not because people are in any way a product of their circumstances. Talk about ignorance! Talk about an inability to see through the eyes of one's potential constituents!
Typical entitled Anglo-Aryan rhetoric, easily dismissed. Except, for some reason, it's not been - yet.
I'm flabbergasted that Trump is apparently striking a chord with my fellow countrymen, that he is in the news so much, that he's considered a serious contender for the most respected job in this or any other country. Are we the people, who figuratively have the entire world in the palms of our hands, really so impressed by this circus act, this bully who arrogantly crows on and on about how he is everyone's "better"? Or (please o please) isn't our impulse to watch him, to goad him, to spur him on, more akin to that which causes us to rubberneck car wrecks?
Just try to imagine for a second, if you will, the donald holding high level diplomatic discussions with Putin or Netanyahu, for example. Somehow, I just don't see how shouting over the top of them and calling them idiots and whatever other names he could think of would result in a positive net gain for our nation.
He's unstable, not someone we can count on for anything other than shock-value soundbytes. He'd make a horrible president, no question about it.
C'mon people, ain't politics meant to mean something more than entertainment?
The real question is: what does it say about the state of the Grand Old Party that none of the fifteen other candidates compares favorably to him?!